Collaborative Access: The use of controlled and uncontrolled vocabularies

I think that the key issue is access.  From personal experience and as a student in GSLIS I find the LCSH vocabulary counter-intuitive.  If we consider that the past practice and creation of that system is post-digital age than we can understand and accept its usage within information science. Yet the simplicity of Google searches or Amazon purchases sets an expectation of access that is ever re-defining itself.

Within the last twenty years we have moved into what could be considered the digital age.  I see a parallel between controlled and un-controlled vocabulary usage much like the difficulties to get everyone on board with abandoning dedicated word processors, typewriters and using PCs and Macs.  Of course as technology progressed usage became more seamless and accessible.  The idea of “user friendliness” can apply in both instances.

The very idea of “controlled” vocabulary conjures an elitism that is no longer relevant.  I find the hierarchical structure of LCSH rooted in a system that is not collaborative or encouraging inclusion of all those that make up our population. 

“Controlled vocabulary also aids the institution in keeping their subjects politically neutral and objective.” (Andra – “Increasing Access Through Tagging”)

I really appreciate this comment because not only is it true but the LOC has been slow to recognize and change racial and gender based terminology under the guise that terms are interlinked and this would disrupt the current system. 

Yes, there are many problems with uncontrolled vocabularies – syntax, homonyms, synonyms.  I do not see the complete elimination of controlled vocabularies.  However, the users’ access should be the focal point of taxonomy – not the creation of complex and insular disciple driven language.

Folksonomy is well suited for the photographic archive.  No one’s perception is the same and the comments of multiple users about a photograph or collection I feel, would be extremely helpful to researchers, librarians, archivists, artists and users across multiple disciplines.

Browsing Flickr Commons – I chose to look for photos on African American life (especially early 19^th century) and was surprised to find a member (since 2007) who had compiled a Black History Album that was very extensive and crossed many chronologies.  This is an excellent example of creative and collaborative information sharing.